It was a crayfish husk; sun bleached and dried out, barely even an inch long, with dirt encrusted on the underside of the carapace, missing several legs on the side that had been exposed to the elements, it was beautiful.
What color remained had faded into soft rose petal pink highlights on a maize background, it was so startling to discover this little skeleton of a creature I had grown up with in such a small size that I just sat in the leaf fall, among a patch of flowers I had gone down to look at in the first place, looking at it, spinning it to see if indeed this tiny thing was the creature I remembered from my childhood, and I remembered that to a child things seem so much bigger.
Here in my hand I held this teeny tiny crayfish that measured barely an inch in length, when as a child I could remember catching crayfish no smaller than 2.5 inches long, with the largest one seeming to be as big as my parents hands (and me being a horse person, this puts the crayfish at about four inches long). In my many escapades in the creek behind my house, I do not believe I had ever come across a crayfish so tiny, although to be fair a crayfish so small would have no trouble hiding under the niche of a rock or in one of the moss beds that dotted the creek upon feeling the disturbance a large group of children aged 2 to 5 and their parents made while romping through the shallow waters of the creek.
I meticulously sketched the crayfish husk in my notebook, and made note of its location so that I could ask my professors about it later, as I had not expected to come across crayfish in the creek that cut right through the college campus. Upon my return to the meeting place I had shown the husk to my professors, Dr. Rasmussen had me examine the crayfish more closely than I probably ever had before. I took note of the three legs and set of claws, making it resemble a lobster, or even a scorpion for that matter.
I will have to return to check on the creek when it has some more water in it to see if I can find some living crayfish, and perhaps check to see if they are all equally small, or if there are any comparable in size to the ones of my childhood. I should also look into returning to the old creek bed behind my house to see how the crayfish population there has done over the years.
During a field trip to the Charmlee Wilderness Park I came across a kind of hummingbird sage looking bush, however the leaves were shiny and a darker forest green instead of the almost mint leaf look hummingbird sage has. The leaves had a very similar growth pattern to hummingbird sage, so I was confused until I came across hummingbird sage that I could positively ID as hummingbird sage. I will have to look into what type of plant it was that I came across.
![]() |
| To the left is the unidentified plant |
![]() |
| Hummingbird Sage |
![]() |
| View from Ranch House lookout |
I had also noticed along the trail that there were some burn scars and charred branches below the undergrowth. This indicated a massive fire had ripped through the area, however there was enough older green growth to indicate the fire had occurred several years prior. I was able to identify several young coyote bushes that had no burn scars, meaning they had sprouted after the fire. Being familiar with Coyote Bush and its growth patterns I approximately aged the two little bushes between two and three years old, after investigating the history of the area I found the Camarillo Spring Fire of 2013 had ripped through the area, meaning my estimation of three years was correct.
After taking notes on the fire damage I was pleasantly surprised to run across a strand of yucca plants, some of which had seed pods from a recent bloom, the rest were just the base of the plant. The strand, to the best of my knowledge, runs from the old farmhouse ruins and all along Russell Trail, however by that time the rain had really began to come down and the call was given to head back to our respective vehicles so I was only able to go halfway up the trail before having to turn around due to the extreme weather conditions.


I really liked your writing style. Something that stood out to me was that you applied context to nature, specifically in your attempt to date the fire that left the damage to the area you found yourself exploring. In terms of the writing style, I appreciated that you start out with a very interesting narrative, describing your discovery and examination of the crawfish. The detail was intriguing and I found it very easy to follow. To give you just a bit of constructive criticism, I noticed that since you were so specific in your description of the two plants, you may have lost sight of the much broader green reality that surrounded you. I suggest you try to describe the overall location and then add those details to expand on what you saw as a whole. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your blog, your writing style is captivating and your details insightful. –Elizabeth Noji
ReplyDeleteHi! Your story about the crayfish was very interesting. I think it added a personal touch to the post that descriptions of just the wilderness wouldn't be able to do: it helped me get to know you as well as your experience. I liked that you told this as a story, so it didn't read like an assignment. However, there are a few pieces of your writing that you might want to go through again. I noticed a few typos and a run-on sentence, so just be on the lookout for things like that. You might also want to add a transition between your time at Kingsmen Park and Charmlee-- it would help things read a little smoother. Other than that, everything looks great!-- Valerie K.
ReplyDelete