I revisited Rancho Sierra Vista to get a comparison to see how things changed in the months that I had not been there, on my first visit on the 27th of February the plants were just beginning to grow and blossom with new growth and flowering buds everywhere I looked, the meadow grass was no taller than two feet tall, reaching up to just above my knees. However upon my return I found that all the bright green spring growth had turned a deep summer green and many of the flowers had either begun to lose their petals and wilt, or had already turned into seed pods. The grass was up to my waist and was sporting several grass species that were previously indistinguishable from one another due to lack of identifying features, but due to their seed pods were easily distinguished.
 |
| Green field and a fire scarred bush |
 |
| Lonely strand of cactus with a cul-de-sac backdrop. |
At the top of the hill my companion, Jackie, made a comment about how this park is likely to be gone 100 years from now. At the time I shot her comment down, Rancho Sierra is a protected park and green space with a Native American Culture Center in it, this green space will be protected. Looking out over the gentle rolling hills covered in waves of green grasses I could see homes and cul-de-sacs looming ominously in in the background with their cheery yellow plaster walls and terracotta roof tiles, I began to have doubts. For those children who have never had the chance to experience nature, those with what McKee calls "nature-deficit disorder", this green-space will have little to no value, but if this space disappears then how will the future generations ever learn the value of nature? Especially since they seem so fond of modern technology, but technology 100 years from now? We cannot even begin to imagine, as for the plants and animals that are present 100 years from now we may safely assume that they will closely resemble what was seen today, perhaps a few species would go extinct, or a few non-native invasive species will appear, but it should resemble what was seen during my visits, so long as the land is left alone and not bulldozed under and leveled to make space for new housing. This is a form of uniformitarianism.
 |
A lucky shot
 |

 |
| Because dandy lions |
 |
Picture of a bush from first visit
 |
Same bush 2 months later
|
|
 |
Ground bee nest, the bees are not visible in this shot.
 |
A little further up the path, more nests.
|
|
This is to me one of the saddest things imaginable, especially since I grew up working in and around nature. But if there is anything I have learned about nature, it that it always finds a way. In 2005 a fire came and ravaged through the park burning down everything in its path. On my earlier visit to the park a fire scarred bush caught my attention, it stood in stark contrast to all the greenery around it.
One thing I found on the trip that I had not anticipated, but should have expected, especially with all the local flowers, were the bees. Now when a person normally thinks of bees they think of a hive with one queen up in a tree and stinging, the bees we came across were not those bees. Instead they lived in the ground, one queen for each hole in the ground with the boys buzzing around hoping to impress. I found through the
Cornell University website that the bees we came across were gregarious nesters and only the females had stingers.
Colletes inaequalis is a non-aggressive species of ground bee that will only sting when provoked.
 |
Picture from Cornell University (I did not want to get too close to the bees) |
On the same website I found that ground bees make up 70% of the 20,000 species of bees around the world. I was at first surprised by this, but once I thought about it this statistic made sense. It is likely that bees live in laces were there are little to no trees (for example the prairie) and yet there are many flowers present in these wide grasslands environments, therefore it makes sense that bees have adapted to make burrows under the ground (or is it the other way around and they have adapted to make nests in trees?). Looking at this from an evolutionary standpoint it may make the most sense that bees began underground and due to pressures from predators moved their hives up into the trees to get out of reach and to be closer to their food source.
The Feature Section: featuring Poison Oak comparison and Grasshopper & Caterpillar
 |
Poison Oak first visit
 |
| Poision Oak 2 months later |
|
 |
Two very creepy crawlies
 |
Makena,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog post. Your detailed observations coupled with the impressive pictures allowed me to feel as though I were on the walk with you. Descriptions were concise yet equally detailed, a definite strong point of your writing. One of the most interesting components was how you were able to compare specimens on your first trip to this most recent one. For example, your before and after pictures of the bush were fascinating. This concept effectively tied in to your broader theme of change over time, as evidenced through Jackie's "100 years" comment and the evolution of bee's nests. Additionally, your voice remains constant throughout the post--the writing feels individually unique. One area I thought you could have improved upon was incorporating course readings. The McKee reference is good, but a little more would be better. Also, the post ends somewhat abruptly. A conclusion that tied everything together would strengthen your work.Other than these minor suggestions, your blog was very well done. It maintained my interest and gave me great insight into your trip. Excellent job!
Ryan Mundy
This post was quite enjoyable to read. I found it interesting how your research showed that contradictory to the general stereotype, most bee species are ground bees, and I found your observation about why it made sense to be interesting, especially since I myself hadn't really given much thought to all the tree-less yet flower-abundant areas there are. I appreciated how you were able to relate how you grew up in nature to your observation about how the future may one day look. To me, it added personal emotion to what it was you were saying. Something that I felt could you could have done more of was incorporate class readings. You only briefly mentioned McKee, and I felt that you could have gone more in depth with that reading and perhaps incorporated others as well. There were also occasions where the grammar was a little hard to follow, mainly longer sentences that could have been split into two sentences in order to add more clarity. But other than that, I really enjoyed reading your blog post!
ReplyDeleteJackie Licoscos